LXD Case Study

Safety Institute

A two-module online course helping front line supervisors at a municipal utilities organization recognize and respond to psychological safety risks.

Client
Safety Institute
Deliverable
2-module eLearning course
Tools
Articulate Storyline, Photoshop, Illustrator, XD
Timeline
6 weeks
My Role
LXD, Instructional Design, Visual Design
Read Case Study ← All Case Studies
gas mask
94%

Course completion rate

2

Modules delivered

4.8

Avg. learner rating / 5

6wk

End-to-end timeline

Overview

The Safety Institute needed to upskill over 200 front-line supervisors, scattered across multiple shifts and field sites; on the concept of psychological safety. Classroom delivery wasn't viable. The training had to be self-paced, accessible on any device, and meet AODA Level AA requirements.

The bigger challenge: "psychological safety" is abstract. Supervisors needed to see it in context: real situations, real decisions, not just read a definition and tick a box.

04 — Course Preview

Experience the course

An interactive preview — click through the lessons and try the knowledge checks below.

Psychological Safety at Work
Progress
1 / 5

Introduction

Welcome to Psychological Safety at Work

This two-module course helps you — as a supervisor — understand what psychological safety is, why it matters for your team's performance, and what you can do on the job to build more of it.

You'll work through real scenarios, make decisions, and get immediate feedback. No trick questions — just realistic situations from workplaces like yours.

🎯

Learning outcomes

Define psychological safety and identify it in practice.

Time to complete

Approx. 20 minutes across two modules.

📋

What to expect

Scenarios, decision points, and a reflection activity.

Core Concepts

What psychological safety looks like

Psychological safety is the belief that you won't be punished or humiliated for speaking up with ideas, questions, concerns, or mistakes. Here's what it looks — and doesn't look — like on your team.

🗣

Speaking up

Team members raise concerns and ideas without fear of being dismissed or ridiculed.

Reporting errors

Mistakes are treated as learning opportunities, not reasons for blame.

🤝

Asking for help

Team members feel comfortable admitting they don't know something.

💬

Respectful disagreement

Different opinions can be expressed without conflict becoming personal.

Scenario

The silent team

Read the scenario below, then answer the knowledge check question.

👷
Marcus Front-line Supervisor, Water Operations

"I noticed my crew has stopped bringing up problems in morning briefings. Last week one of them spotted a valve issue but didn't say anything until the end of shift. I'm worried something bigger could get missed."

⎇ Your decision

As Marcus's manager, what's the most effective first step?

Taking Action

Supervisor behaviours that build safety

Research by Amy Edmondson (Harvard) identifies specific behaviours that supervisors use to build — or unintentionally erode — psychological safety. Here are the four most impactful.

🎤

Model humility

Admit your own mistakes and uncertainty openly. It signals it's safe for others to do the same.

👂

Ask genuine questions

Proactively invite input — especially from quieter team members. Silence isn't agreement.

🚦

Respond productively

Thank people for raising concerns even when the news isn't good. Punishment kills candour.

🔁

Close the loop

Let people know what happened with their input. Ignored suggestions stop coming.

🪞 Reflection

Think of a time a team member came to you with a concern or a mistake. How did you respond — and how might that response have shaped whether they'd do it again?

Completion

Course Complete

🎖

Course Complete

You've completed both modules of Psychological Safety at Work. Your completion has been recorded in your learning profile.

Completion Certificate

Psychological Safety at Work

The Challenge

A two-module online course helping front line supervisors at a municipal utilities organization recognize and respond to psychological safety risks.

The Process

1

Discovery & SME interviews

Three interviews with supervisors and HR to identify real scenarios where psychological safety breaks down.
ResearchInterviews
2

Instructional design & storyboard

Scenario-based branching structure with decision points mapped to real supervisor situations.
StoryboardsInterviews
3

Visual design & prototype

High-fidelity mockups in Adobe XD, reviewed by client before Storyline build.
Adobe XDVisual Design
4

Storyline build & accessibility audit

Full WCAG 2.2 AA audit: contrast ratios, keyboard nav, screen reader testing, alt text.
StorylineAODA

Key Decisions

Scenario-based over slide-based

Built branching decision scenarios instead of information-dump slides, keeping content grounded in real situations supervisors face on shift.

Why: Research shows scenario-based learning increases knowledge retention by 40–60% versus passive content consumption.

WCAG 2.2 AA compliance from day one

Accessibility baked in at the design stage, not retrofitted — colour contrast, keyboard navigation, and alt text reviewed in every build iteration.

Why: The client's AODA obligations require AA compliance; building in from the start avoids costly remediation later.

Mobile-first layout

Designed for phone first — most supervisors access training between shifts on personal devices, not at a desk.

Why: Analytics from client's LMS showed 68% of completions were on mobile. Responsive layout was non-negotiable.

"Richard delivered something we could actually be proud of - and more importantly, something our supervisors actually completed. The scenarios felt real because they were based on our actual workplace situations."

— - Learning Manager, Municipal Safety Institute